Mr. Sharp was caught with child pornography and was arrested for distrusting of child pornography, under the Criminal Code of Canada s.163.1(4). Also, he was charged with one count of possession for the purposes of distribution or sale under s. 163.1(3) Criminal Code of Child pornography. Mr. Sharpe, challenge the Courts, as he felt that the crown and government has infringed s. 2(b) Under the Canadian Charter Right And Freedom. Also, Mr.Sharpe felt it was justified, under 1(a) of the charter. Mr.Sharpe, he said the Criminal Code of Canada s.163.1(4) under s. 7 of the Charter, by arguing that exposure to potential imprisonment as a result, of an excessively sweeping law, is contrary to the principles of fundamental justice. Mr.Sharpe said, he has the right to freedom of expression, that the pornography he had, an art form expression. That under the Criminal code Of Canada S.163.1(4). Mr. Sharpe did not hurt anyone, in reality, to make the pictures, as this is just an art form, of which he used for personal.
Which the government, has broken the Charter Right And Freedom 2(b). That protect anyone, that want to express themselves without being judge and judgment, against them. Also, Mr. Sharpe said that the law has broken the law, under the charter (7), security and liberty of anyone that are Canadian. As a result, the government, had broken his right and should be tossed out the court.
The of British Columbia of Appeal, said that the court has confronted with a law that is substantially constitutional and peripherally problematic, the Court may consider a number of alternatives. Until the Government of Canada, can find another way to target evil people. Another alternative way is, might be to hold that the law as it only applies to the case at bar is valid, declining to find it unconstitutional on the basis of a hypothetical scenario that has not yet arisen. In, the United State the law had court had