Upholding a rather nostalgic title, “Where areUpholding a rather nostalgic title, “Where are

Upholding a rather nostalgic title, “Where are you going, Where have you been”, Jane Carroll Oates portrays destruction of innocence and affinity to abuse of young adolescent, Connie. An assortment of tactful devices allow the reader to foresee the events that will follow as young, innocent Connie falls into the deceit of the tricky Arnold Friend and ultimately an abductee. Fluctuation in tone, concise characterization, and narrative point-of-view aid the understanding the implications and unwritten events that Connie face as she leaves with Arnold.The story begins in exposing the main character of Connie, listing an array of stereotypical traits in a traditional manner. Quickly the premature adolescent desires of the young girl become evident, constructing a sympathetic tone. As the story progresses, more specifically with the dialogue that takes places between Arnold Friend and Connie, the tone transitions toward being more serious and apprehensive Arnold is seen mischievous and untrustworthy, while Oates portrays. Connie as increasingly uncomfortable with the engagement as she repeatedly asks Arnold to leave. This rise in tension creates a tangible uneasiness and suspense allowing the reader to easily predict the undisclosed events that follow her surrender.Connie is characterized as stereotypical teenage girl with low esteem and casual discourse with her mother. Early on, Oates describes Connie dual personalities, which establish a premise that implies that Connie could be untrustworthy and unsure of herself. Her encounters with friends, and later Arnold, contribute to her innocence and lack of instincts to danger, shown by her inability to fleet from the obvious danger that had been present. Her disposition to a harmful situation, constructed by her character, indicates a probable danger. Arnold as well is characterized specifically to come across as diminutive and deceitful. Through the progression of the story, supporting evidence combined with both Connie and Arnold’s character to further solidify the prediction of Connie’s future of sexual abuse by Arnold and possible death.”Her name was Connie”; a simple phrase bearing the most importance to the story as it immediately shows that the story is to be narrated in the past tense. It also resembles an obituary-like approach to telling a story of the character’s life, one that has passed on. In using third person narrative to tell the story, Oates gives the reader exposure to both characters, describing their articulation and dialogue in a way that brings the characters alive. By doing so, readers can better acknowledge the increasing animosity of the situation, foreshadowing the fate that Connie soon faces.The fate of Connie is left undetermined by the author leaving the reader to interpret the text individually for him or herself. Oates intentionally leaves this open to the reader coincidently with using a variety of devices to aid in foreshadowing the evident proceeding events that Connie will soon endure.